The EZQuest UltraSlim 70W GaN II Twin USB-C charger (official page) targets customers who need actual laptop-class charging efficiency in a design that’s considerably thinner than conventional energy bricks. Its official highlights embrace a most output of 70 watts, two USB-C Energy Supply ports, and an ultra-slim profile that EZQuest claims is extra compact and sensible than most competing 45 to 70-watt chargers. These claims are enticing on paper, and this evaluate verifies how the charger performs in real-world situations, together with laptop computer charging, dual-device charging, warmth administration, and total practicality.
Design
The UltraSlim 70W has a really distinctive design. It’s extremely flat, solely 13 millimeters thick, and formed like a small plate somewhat than a dice. Competing compact chargers typically use cube-like shapes that protrude considerably from the wall. In distinction, the EZQuest charger sits near the outlet and retains the cable pointing downward.
This design is, in my view, significantly helpful when touring. On airplanes, seat shops are sometimes positioned in entrance of you, in a cramped space. Dice chargers stick out and have a tendency to get bumped or kicked when individuals transfer out and in of the row. I’ve had two chargers broken this fashion. The flat design reduces publicity and dramatically lowers the possibility of unintentional influence. Behind furnishings or in tight corners, the design can be extra sensible and simpler to handle.

When packed in a bag or pocket, the UltraSlim 70W takes up little or no area. The flat form makes use of area extra effectively than dice chargers of comparable complete quantity. Though some opponents are barely smaller in absolute quantity, the UltraSlim 70W is extra transportable in actual utilization. The construct high quality is honest, and the plastic housing feels just like many high-end opponents on this class.

Total, the design just isn’t solely completely different but additionally superior for journey and day by day portability. It’s affordable to anticipate that different manufacturers will finally undertake related kind components.
Charging Efficiency
Laptop computer charging
Throughout testing, the EZQuest UltraSlim delivered as much as 68 watts whereas charging a MacBook Professional. That is very near the marketed 70 watt output. The charger stayed cool throughout prolonged classes, a powerful feat for a tool of this measurement. Many skinny chargers are inclined to warmth up rapidly below full load, however this one manages warmth very effectively.
Trendy skinny & gentle laptops that require 60-65 watts can run and cost at full efficiency with this charger. For computer systems that sometimes ship with a bigger energy provide, like my Macbook Professional 140W charger, the 70W can maintain the battery if used for gentle duties. From a laptop computer charging perspective, the UltraSlim meets expectations.
Smartphone and pill charging
Smartphones behave otherwise. Lots of them depend on proprietary quick charging protocols that aren’t a part of USB Energy Supply. Consequently, they won’t attain their most rated speeds. In follow:
- Honor Magic V5 charged at about 25 watts (the producer charger can attain 66 watts)
- Galaxy S24 Extremely charged at about 33 watts
- Current iPhones sometimes cost at round ~20 watts
The UltraSlim nonetheless costs telephones “rapidly”, however not at producer proprietary peak speeds (50W for Samsung, 66W for Honor). That is regular for a third-party USB-PD charger.
Twin machine charging and habits
The charger helps two units on the similar time, however energy allocation just isn’t -that- dynamic. EZQuest specifies that the charger makes use of considered one of two configurations: 35 watts plus 35 watts, or 45 watts plus 20 watts.
In actual use, when charging a MacBook Professional and a smartphone collectively, the laptop computer drew about 35 watts and the telephone drew about 20 watts. Although the laptop computer alone beforehand drew 68 watts, the charger clearly switched into the 35 watt plus 35 watt mode. That is wonderful for 2 smaller units, corresponding to two telephones or a telephone and a pill, however customers shouldn’t anticipate full laptop computer energy whereas a second machine is related.
The cable just isn’t included. For greatest efficiency, a high-quality USB-C cable is required, ideally an e-marked cable that helps 60 to 100 watt charging. As of late, it’s very simple to seek out (comparatively) reasonably priced USB-C cables rated for 240W.
Competitivity
Amongst chargers within the 45-70 watt class, the UltraSlim stands out for its kind issue. A cube-shaped charger with the same energy output typically occupies extra bodily area when plugged in, regardless that its technical quantity is smaller. The flat design is extra sensible in actual situations.
In contrast with commonplace 70 watt chargers from main manufacturers, the EZQuest charger is considerably smaller and simpler to hold. Multi-port GaN chargers from different manufacturers present extra ports or increased complete wattage, however they’re bodily bigger and fewer handy for journey.
“THE ULTRASLIM STANDS OUT FOR ITS FORM FACTOR”
The dearth of a USB-A port could disappoint some customers, however including one would doubtless require extra thickness, undermining the design. A USB-C-to-USB-A adapter can resolve this if wanted.
There are very cheap 65 or 100 watt GaN chargers from unknown manufacturers, however reliability and long-term security range broadly. When connecting an costly laptop computer or smartphone, many customers choose a trusted model. Inside this context, the EZQuest UltraSlim competes on design, actual efficiency, and sensible portability somewhat than sheer port depend or uncooked watt-per-dollar metrics.
If value is a priority, don’t fear in regards to the $49.99 MSRP. Yow will discover this product on Amazon for $19.99 (on the time of publication). See evaluate header hyperlink.
Conclusion
The EZQuest UltraSlim 70W is a superb possibility for travellers and anybody who wants a compact charger that powers a contemporary laptop computer. It performs close to its rated 70 watts, it stays cool below load, and it affords a singular flat design that solves actual issues in tight areas or crowded environments. Smartphone charging is restricted by USB-PD requirements, not by the charger itself.
If design doesn’t matter, there are cheaper alternate options, though many are from unknown manufacturers. If you happen to carry an costly laptop computer or telephone, paying slightly extra for a dependable and well-designed charger feels justified. The UltraSlim 70W delivers a compelling steadiness of efficiency, portability, and security that few chargers on this energy vary can match.
Highs
- Extremely-thin, flat, and very travel-friendly design
- Practically full-rated energy (≈68 W) below actual load
- Cool thermal habits even below sustained laptop computer draw
- Far more compact than commonplace 60–70 W chargers
Lows
- No cable included — you should provide a high quality USB-C PD cable your self
- Energy sharing just isn’t totally dynamic — dual-device charging reduces per-device wattage
- Cellphone charging restricted to USB-PD commonplace speeds (no proprietary quick charging)
Ranking + Worth
- Ranking: 9.2/10
- Worth: ~$19.99
- Obtainable on Amazon
Trending Merchandise
Antec C8, Fans not Included, RTX 40...
Logitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and M...
Cudy TR3000 Pocket-Sized Wi-Fi 6 Wi...
RedThunder K10 Wireless Gaming Keyb...
ASUS 22” (21.45” viewable) 1080...
SAMSUNG 32″ Odyssey G55C Seri...
ASUS VA24DQ 23.8” Monitor, 1080P ...
Thermaltake View 200 TG ARGB Mother...
ASUS 24 Inch Desktop Monitor –...
